Magyk wrote:USA gonna blame yet another innocent country for this leak, cause a major war, bla bla bla...USA foreign policy pattern repeating itself
I'm not even going to comment, other than to point out that Iran and North Korea are hardly "innocent."
You're more retarded than I thought.
This is pretty off topic but how would you classify a country that removed a democratically elected leader and installed an autocrat in his place?
See Operation Ajax.
It makes you think a bit differently about how Iran has turned out.
Helaku wrote:USA gonna blame yet another innocent country for this leak, cause a major war, bla bla bla...USA foreign policy pattern repeating itself
This just might not end the right way for them, if they try to pick on Iran or Korea.
They're not going to blame a country for it. The most they're going to do is attempt to place all the focus on Assange and then mount a smear campaign against him and Wikileaks. The other publishers probably wont even get a mention. If something this bad happens, you try to shift the focus. There's not much else you can do initially without raising the ire of the public. However, there are a lot of things people will turn a blind eye to if the party that is being subjected to it has been vilified enough in the media.
Here's some of what I'm talking about. from the wiki article: "U.S. Congressman Peter T. King called for WikiLeaks to be designated as a terrorist organization."
Anyway, apart from that, I think it's important to remember that neither wikileaks or Assange are important here. The leaked information is what is really important, the rest is nonsensical rubbish spouted by people who would rather not be scrutinised so closely.