JKAsiege

Would you guys want to see shields and/or mines in a new map? I personally like that cargo has no shields or mines. You don't have to worry about "oh shit this demo's probably going to spam me" or "oh shit the jan has a new shield" and you can just focus on the objectives or killing people.

But on the other hand, Hoth is the most popular map in NA and has both -- is it the map people love or the shields and mines?

As much as spam sucks, the two indisputable best siege maps (and most often played) are the most prominent in spam, because all in all, mines are fun, and so are shields.

All the different kinds of weapons imo make siege so fun.

new maps don't need mines. cargo has no mines, and does fine without them.

Mines: no
Shield: yes, but only if the map design doesn't allow a shield to completely block an objective (i.e. two or more paths to an objective)

I know this...

If you give one team fields, give the other team fields as well....

I think Hoth would be much more interesting if the Imps had fields.

~archi

no mines no shelds good, maybe no DEMP too

agree with Darth Wayne.
maybe some mines but only if its possible to make like 5, 10 would be to much(spam)

aƒrÒ wrote:agree with Darth Wayne.
maybe some mines but only if its possible to make like 5, 10 would be to much(spam)

You can only do 10 or 20.

And hoth D snowtroopers can still spam mines...

Only niggers think that removing weapons from the game will make the game better.

Why not fucking play saber only ffa? Can't fucking spam shields in THAT! NO MINES OR BALL SPAM, EITHER! YOU CANT EVEN SPAM GROUND WITH ROCKETS!

is it all that bad to believe that raven fucked up and we'd like to change it?