JKAsiege

Caesar wrote:Suz 2 say, but I used actual math. It is, legitimately, a geometric theorem used in proofs. I proved mine, GG.

USA > GHANA = GER i just did the math so keep saying the u.s. will lose to germany without sources..

Schrute's statement, as it stands, reads: The USA is better than Ghana, where Ghana is the equivalent of Germany. So...Schrute is saying we will beat Germany, whereas I prove just the opposite. We are not saying the same thing re re. [That is of course unless Schrute meant what I said] GG

We ARE going to lose, however. Just admit it and it will all be over soon.

i don't understand why you keep talking about how you don't follow soccer at all and then act like you're the most knowledgeable person on the subject

Ceasar's equation literally reads as "If 1 is more than 2 and 2 is more than 3, 1 is more than 3"

That's all good and dandy until you remember that 1 isn't greater than 2 or 3.

So you think because x beats y in one game x>y? It must be so liberating to be so ignorant

Ceasar's equation literally reads as "If 1 is more than 2 and 2 is more than 3, 1 is more than 3"

That's all good and dandy until you remember that 1 isn't greater than 2 or 3.

Your mathematics skills are seriously, seriously lacking. I sincerely hope you weren't serious/sober when you wrote this. I can't even... Try this genius: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitive ... f_equality

So you think because x beats y in one game x>y? It must be so liberating to be so ignorant

I don't think this. It is common knowledge that 'soccer' is not, nor has it ever been, an American sport. Frankly I am surprised we beat Ghana. To assume that x>y, after one game, is a tenuous argument to say the least. I drew my conclusions by looking at the American standing in the 'soccer' world. One can only assume that x>y after reviewing these statistics. So, once again, simple deductive reasoning can show that we have slim, if any, chances of beating Germany. It would take a miracle of God himself to pull a win off....that or a severe fuck up.

sorry ceasar is right

ceasar maths:

germany > ghana

ghana > usa so germany > usa

according to schrute:

Usa > ghana and Ghana = germany

so Usa > Germany

just to tell the difference between u both.

my maths:

considering that Usa > Ghana

and Ghana= Germany still doesnt means Usa > or = Germany

Germany is Op

WHY ARE WE TRYING TO PROVE SOMETHING THAT IS CLEARLY OPINION BASED????????????????????????????

u guys started with the maths

sorry ceasar is right

ceasar maths:

germany > ghana

ghana > usa so germany > usa

according to schrute:

Usa > ghana and Ghana = germany

so Usa > Germany

just to tell the difference between u both.

my maths:

considering that Usa > Ghana

and Ghana= Germany still doesnt means Usa > or = Germany

Germany is Op

Thank you. I was just proving that shrute is retarded, and is now a big salty.

piipe wrote:u guys started with the maths

i was clearly being serious in my in depth conclusion that was not biased or flawed

http://rs565.pbsrc.com/albums/ss96/TheTwilightStorm/Twitch%20Faces/PJSalt.jpg~c200

Schrute and Ceasar are/were both dealing in absolutes, but at least Schrute's absolutes were accurate. If we're going with a math analogy, then the US is better than Ghana and Ghana is equal to Germany. Ceasar was being retarded by trying to change the absolute facts within the equation. Only a sith deals in absolutes.