Max Rambone wrote:Better than firefox?
~archi
There doesn't seem to be that much special about it. I also love the wikipedia's malware section on IE9.
NSS Lab reports IE9 blocks 99% of malware compared to Firefox's 19%. The only problem is what the report is actually talking about.
From the NSS Labs report:
"Note: This study does not evaluate browser security related to vulnerabilities in plug-ins or the browsers themselves."
"For clarity, the following definition is used for a socially-engineered malware URL: a web page link that directly leads to a download that delivers a malicious payload whose content type would lead to execution, or more generally a website known to host malware links. These downloads appear to be safe, like those for a screen saver application, video codec upgrade, etc., and are designed to fool the user into taking action. Security professionals also refer to these threats as “consensual” or “dangerous” downloads."
So i'm curious as to how this type of malware protection actually works. Is it just a URL blacklist? A file name blacklist? Some sort of generated hash key check? Maybe even heuristic scanning? Nope, it's this:

(Image from NSS report).
That is what constitutes a 'block'.
